Purpose: To maximize peak distribution within the two dimensional space by adjusting the secondary oven temperature offset and/or length of column in the secondary oven.
Experiments:
With the recommended columns, inlet and temperature programs make two methods with the following modifications:
1) Set the Modulation Period and Hot Pulse Times in both methods to 10 and 3 seconds respectively.
2) Set the Secondary Oven Offset in one method to +5 °C and the other to +40 °C.
Make an injection of a representative sample or standard with each method. You will note the Method Modulation Period is 10 sec for this evaluation. The long modulation period will decrease the resolution in the first dimension, but this isn’t important in this step. It is set purposely long to prevent any peaks from wrapping around the second dimension. Once this evaluation is complete the Method Modulation Period will match the Optimal Modulation Period.
Process the data. Check that there is no wraparound and identify the last eluting peak in the second dimension. See the example contour plot below. Input the retention time of last eluting peak in the second dimension from each run into Simply GCxGC.
Run with +5 °C offset. The onscreen tooltip shows the first and second dimension retention times (1220, 1.552). The yellow line is the Optimal Modulation Period + Secondary Column Void Time. The orange line is the Secondary Column Void Time. This example is one of several possible results.
| Result Scenario | How will Simply GCxGC Respond? | What is Your Next Step? |
| The last +5 °C injection peak elutes after the Optimal Modulation Period + Secondary Column Void time AND the last +40 °C injection peak elutes between the Optimal Modulation Period + Secondary Column Void time and the Secondary Column Void time. |
Simply GCxGC will calculate an optimal Secondary Oven Offset and reset the Method Modulation Period and Hot Pulse Times to the optimal conditions. | Create a new method with the updated settings shown in the Summary view, and re-inject the same sample or standard to confirm offset. The last eluting peak will elute just before the Secondary Column Void time of the next modulation. |
| In both injections, the last peak elutes after the Optimal Modulation Period + Secondary Column Void time. | The peaks are being retained too long in the secondary oven. | Either remove a loop of column from the secondary oven and retest, or evaluate new stationary phase(s). |
| In both injections, the last peak elutes before the Optimal Modulation Period + Seconary Column Void time. | The peaks are not being retained long enough in the secondary oven. | Either add a loop of column to the secondary oven and retest or evaluate new stationary phase(s). |
Purpose: Select basic system configurations options and begin the process of creating a GCxGC method from scratch or transmuting an existing 1D method to GCxGC.
In this section, the instrument is selected to set parameters specific to that instrument, including transfer line length, outlet pressure, and maximum data acquisition rate. Other user-selected parameters in this section include carrier gas type, primary column dimensions, transfer line temperature, and whether an uncoated column will be installed in the transfer line.
For the primary column, dimensions of an established one-dimensional method can be used as a starting point, or you may select one of two suggested columns.
You may choose to use an uncoated column in the transfer line rather than extending the length of the secondary column. An uncoated transfer line column is given as a choice for those cases when the secondary column must be ramped to its maximum operating temperature. If the second dimension column is installed in the transfer line, significant retention will occur for the analytes eluting at the column’s maximum temperature. This is generally not an issue for 1-dimensional separations, but it is a problem for the fast separation in the second dimension. To eliminate this retention, it is recommended that an uncoated column be installed, especially for the longer transfer line of the Pegasus® GC-HRT 4D. Additionally, the transfer line acts as a restrictor. The longer the transfer line and the narrower its diameter, the greater the restriction. To minimize this, LECO recommends you use an uncoated column with an ID of the next larger standard size. For a 0.25 mm ID, a 0.32 mm ID would be recommended; however, a 0.32 mm ID column will not coil in the secondary oven without breaking. So a for a 0.25 secondary column, install a 0.25 mm ID transfer line column. For secondary columns with smaller IDs, the rule of using a transfer line column with the next largest size applies.
Note: If you have a previously developed one-dimensional GC method, this column may be a good starting point for the primary column.
If you do not have a previously developed 1 dimensional method,the following dimensions are recommended: 30 m x 0.25 mm x 0.25 µm for most cases, or 60 m x 0.25 mm x 0.25 µm for more complex samples.
Guard columns installed between the GC inlet and primary column do not have any effect on peak separation and are not tracked by Simply GCxGC.
The run time cannot be decreased safely for the current column configuration.
Purpose: Examine peak separation more closely. You will determine if the peak capacity (chromatographic resolution) of the separation is sufficient (Good), excessive (also Good but may allow you to decrease run time later), or insufficient (Need More or Need more in Second Only). Need More increases overall peak capacity, while Need More in Second Only increases peak capacity in the secnd dimension specifically.
Select "Good" if the separation meets your assay’s requirements. The next step is an optional consideration to Decrease Run Time.
Select "Need More" if the separation is not acceptable and more peak capacity is needed in both dimensions. The next step is Increase Peak Capacity.
Select "Need More in Second Only" if the resolution in the first dimension is acceptable, but more resolution (peak capacity) is needed in the second dimension. If the selected stationary phase combination is partially successful at separating your peaks increasing the peak capacity can possibly help at the cost of slowing down the analysis. If after increasing the peak capacity the separation is still marginal choosing a different stationary phase combination may be required.
Figure 1: Poor First Dimension Separation
Figure 2: Improved First Dimension Separation
This was the best possible separation from the Determine Secondary Oven Offset and Secondary Column Length example with the given stationary phase combination. It did not meet the Evaluate the Stationary Phase criteria, but you may have decided to continue on anyway to see what might be possible.
It appears that deconvolution may be more difficult compared to the earlier part of the separation. More peak capacity may help, but a different stationary phase combination is also a consideration. With the peaks closely eluting early in the second dimension separation, a reversal of the stationary phases is also a possible solution.
There is some improved resolution, but still poor separation. Again, a change in stationary phase combination is indicated. As in single dimension, further changes to increase peak capacity can be tested, but a more selective stationary phase combination is more likely to lead to an acceptable separation.
The purpose of the Guide Me mode is to provide logical, step-by-step instructions that guide you through the process of developing an optimized GCxGC method.
The Guide Me mode has two components:
1) A computational engine which calculates column dimensions and operating parameters for optimum peak capacity.
2) A logical experimental scheme for evaluating and modifying the separation.
A GCxGC separation depends on column dimensions and operating parameters (peak capacity) which can be calculated; however, the actual distribution of peaks in the two-dimensional separation plane depends largely on the stationary phase chemistry and the particular sample components. Therefore, the development scheme guides you through the experimentation necessary to adjust the retention in the second dimension, optimize the stationary phases, and modify (increase, decrease, redistribute) the peak capacity as required by the goals of your application.
The peak capacity cannot safely be increased for the current column configuration.
The secondary column peak capacity cannot safely be increased for the current configuration.
Purpose: Determine proper sample loading on the column by the experiment.
Experiments:
• Install the column set and create necessary methods with recommended conditions.
• Inject the representative sample or standard.
• Evaluate the most intense peaks for overloading. If overloaded, reduce the amount injected on column and revaluate.
• Evaluate known, low concentration peaks (if any) for sufficient loading. If more sample loading is needed for low level analytes and the most intense peaks are not interfering or overloaded, then increase amount injected on column.
You’ll start by selecting some of your most abundant analytes of interest, looking for signs of phase overloading. You should also look at other, closely eluting peaks for comparison and potential interferences. If you have a list of lower concentration target peaks, you should look for those as well and ensure they are detected.
Sort the Peak Table by Area so the largest peaks are grouped together, keeping in mind that saturated peaks may have their area divided among multiple peak markers. Starting with the most abundant entries double-click on each analytically important peak. Overloaded peaks will present in the Chromatogram with fronting or tailing and be significantly wider, compared to less abundant neighboring peaks or less abundant slices of the same analyte. Some peaks may be poorly shaped for reasons unrelated to phase overloading, so your evaluation should be based on several different peaks over the course of the run.
Overloaded Peak
Acceptable Peak
Note that time axis is scaled the same for both.
If your sample appears to be overloading the phase and your lower concentration target analytes are easily detected consider injecting less sample onto the column. Note that using a thicker film will also increase retention changing the secondary oven offset and secondary column length required. If overloading does not appear to be an issue you can choose to continue on as is or try injecting more sample onto the column to boost detection of lower concentration peaks.
Other Considerations
A column set with 0.25 mm ID is recommended for best sample loading. The secondary column limits the sample loading; therefore, if a smaller bore secondary column is used, the loading on the primary column must be decreased.
To increase the column loading capacity you can also try a thicker film column. Keep in mind this will also increase retention so changing the secondary oven offset and secondary column length (if established) is required.
Initially, a long modulation period (10 sec) is used in this step to avoid having peaks wrap around. If the peaks are marginally overloaded, using the optimum modulation period will reduce the loading somewhat, so slight overloading in one modulation may be acceptable once you transition to the optimal modulation period.
Purpose:Evaluate the final separation of the previous step and determine if the selected stationary phase chemistries, in combination with optimized method settings, adequately distribute the peaks throughout the two-dimensional space and provide the required chromatographic resolution for the application.
Experiments: Optional injections as described in the Evaluation section.
If the peak distribution is not acceptable, select Bad to return to the Stationary Phase Combinations step. If the stationary phases are acceptable, select Good to move on.
Purpose: Select stationary phases for the primary and secondary columns, based on guidelines and/or other knowledge with respect to the sample and stationary phases.
Basic Guidelines:
If you are converting an established 1D method, use the same stationary phase for the primary column and select a complementary stationary phase for the secondary column. The provided table (Phase Suggestions) lists some typical, proven stationary phase combinations. As a starting point, the primary and secondary columns will have the same ID and film thickness.
For new users, selecting appropriate phase combinations for their samples can be an intimidating step. You may use phase combinations from your personal experience, the provided table, or from journal articles. Additionally, most column vendors have a GC column selection guide you can review, and you may contact LECO’s Applications Group at [email protected] for assistance. In addition to the phase chemistries, there are some additional considerations:
• The primary column has much more resolving power than the secondary column. Select the primary stationary phase for the most difficult separations, typically those analytes of same or similar functionality.
• The secondary column is best suited for separating different functionalities. Select the secondary stationary phase based on different analyte functionalities within the sample.
• Keep in mind the maximum temperature of both phases. A high temperature phase can be limited by pairing it with a low temperature counterpart.
• Consider both non-polar/polar combinations and polar/non-polar combinations.
• The most common and default stationary phase combination is Primary Column, Rxi-5MS or Rxi-5SilMS (5% phenyl); Secondary Column, Rxi-17SilMS (50% phenyl).
| Application Area |
Primary Column | Secondary Column | ||
| Phase | Selectivity | Phase | Selectivity | |
| Petrochemical | Rxi®-1ms | Non-polar | Rxi®-17Sil MS | Mid-polar, aromatic selective |
| Petrochemical | Rxi®-5Sil MS | Non-polar | Rxi®-17Sil MS | Mid-polar, aromatic selective |
| PAHs, environmental | Rxi®-17Sil MS | Mid-polar, aromatic selective | Rxi®-1ms | Non-polar |
| PAHs, environmental | Rxi®-17Sil MS | Mid-polar, aromatic selective | Rxi®-5Sil MS | Non-polar |
| PCBs, PBDEs, PAHs, environmental | Rxi®-XLB | Non-polar | Rxi®-17Sil MS | Mid-polar, aromatic selective |
| Mono-ortho, coplanar PCBs | Rxi®-1ms | Non-polar | Rxi®-XLB | Planar selective |
| Mono-ortho, coplanar PCBs | Rxi®-5Sil MS | Non-polar | Rxi®-XLB | Planar selective |
| Pesticides, nitroaromatics, halogenated compounds | Rxi®-1ms | Non-polar | Rtx®-200 | Mid-polar, electronegative selectivity |
| Pesticides, nitroaromatics, halogenated compounds | Rxi®-5Sil MS | Non-polar | Rtx®-200 | Mid-polar, electronegative selectivity |
| Pesticides, nitroaromatics, halogenated compounds | Rxi®-XLB | Non-polar | Rtx®-200 | Mid-polar, electronegative selectivity |
| Flavors, fragrances | Rxi®-1ms | Non-polar | Stabilwax® | Polar |
| Flavors, fragrances | Rxi®-5Sil MS | Non-polar | Stabilwax® | Polar |
| Flavors, fragrances | Stabilwax® | Polar | Rxi®-1ms | Non-polar |
| Flavors, fragrances | Stabilwax® | Polar | Rxi®-5Sil MS | Non-polar |
The purpose of the Advanced tool is to allow the user to change column dimensions and operating parameters to explore the effect of such changes on peak capacity.
The Advanced tool uses the underlying computational engine that is used in the Guide Me tool. The user can change individual parameters while holding the other parameters fixed to calculate peak capacity. With this tool the user can learn what effects the various parameters have on the peak capacity and can explore ways to fine tune a separation. These changes can be compared to those optimum results calculated in the Guide Me tool.
Introduction:
Simply GCxGC is designed to help you create a generally optimized GCxGC method for a thermal modulation system. Simply GCxGC will offer suggestions for optimized conditions, or you may enter your own values if you have a previously established GC method. Later steps will guide you through determining the secondary oven offset, second dimension column length, and experimentally evaluating the stationary phases and peak capacity. Working through these steps should help you avoid unnecessary testing and streamline your method development cycle.
Simply GCxGC assumes that you understand the basics of gas chromatography and GCxGC. Simply GCxGC will explain some concepts as you move along, but if you are new to gas chromatography or GCxGC theory, LECO recommends the following source for more information. Comprehensive Chromatography in Combination with Mass Spectrometry, Luigi Mondello, Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc
| # | Run Time | PC 1 | PC 2 | PC Net |
|---|